Ethereum’s struggles tell a story that’s bigger than losing market share. They confirm the crypto industry’s inability to address the core problems of wealth inequality and its harmful environmental impact. We, as the planning and policy community, need to get out of our slumber. The numbers don't lie: Ethereum's market dominance is circling levels we haven't seen since 2019. XRP, BNB, and Solana are taking its lunch. Why? It's not just about tech. It's about values.

Is Crypto Really For Everyone?

We know — for too long, Ethereum has been seen as a crypto playground for institutional investors and tech elites. In addition, high gas fees price out everyday users, creating a two-tiered system, in practice if not by design. Though supporters praise its technological innovations, the truth is that the average Joe can hardly afford to get in on the action. This creates resentment. This fuels the rise of competitors. Think about it: XRP boasts lower transaction costs, BNB offers a broader ecosystem, and Solana champions speed. These features aren’t just improvements on paper, their residents see them as long awaited opportunities to allow marginalized communities to finally get a slice of the pie.

We need to ask ourselves a hard question: is crypto truly democratizing finance, or is it just replicating the existing power structures with a digital veneer? The decrease in Ethereum's TVL market share, from 61.2% to 51.7% in a few months, isn't just a blip. That’s an encouraging signal that voters are voting with their wallets, looking for options that match their values. The American public is losing billions to these scams, and they are furious.

Environmental Impact: A Moral Failure?

Beyond financial accessibility, Ethereum’s previous energy consumption (pre-Merge) had left a significant legacy. The transition to Proof-of-Stake is a big step in the right direction. If we’re serious about saving the planet, the maritime industry needs to step up its game and do more to mitigate its environmental effects. The impact of eco-minded investors, especially among the youngest generation—Gen Z—of investors, is putting pressure on companies to make sustainability a priority. If crypto is serious about becoming a force for good, it will urgently find solutions to its environmental harm. The failure to do so is not only a PR nightmare waiting to happen, but it’s a moral travesty.

Picture a world where blockchain technology underwrites renewable energy projects, advances sustainable supply chains, and rewards individuals and organizations for more proactive resource stewardship. That’s the future we should be fighting for—not the one chasing after speculative returns.

Regulation: Friend or Foe of Innovation?

The elephant in the room is regulation. Many in the crypto space view regulation as anathema to innovation, but I believe responsible regulation is essential for long-term sustainability. We've seen the dark side of unregulated DeFi platforms: scams, rug pulls, and market manipulation run rampant. This is what prevents mainstream adoption and damages public trust.

Most importantly, we need clear regulations that protect vulnerable investors, prevent market manipulation, and establish transparency. This evidence-and market-based approach does not inhibit innovation. Rather, it creates a more level playing field where good faith projects can succeed and bad actors can be reined in. Think of it like building codes: they might add some upfront costs, but they ultimately ensure that buildings are safe and habitable.

I'm not talking about draconian measures that stifle innovation. I’m referring to intelligent, targeted regulations that tackle the very real risks of crypto. Regulations that encourage social responsibility. Regulations should encourage innovation while ensuring safety and sustainability. The other option? A newly unearthed Wild West where only the richest and most elite players will be able to succeed.

The bear flag pattern forming on Ethereum's charts, with a potential price target of $1,100, isn't just a technical indicator. It's a warning sign. Another sign that the market is losing faith. The one bright spot — and a sign that we should head in a different direction.

That’s why we all need to insist that the crypto industry do better and be held accountable. Instead, we should be making infrastructure investments to advance projects that explicitly prioritize social and environmental sustainability. And we need to do our part by pushing for smart, effective regulation that protects investors while fostering innovation. The future of crypto depends on it. Rather than allowing Ethereum’s crisis to serve as a death knell, let’s make it a wake-up call. A request to commit to a more just, equitable and sustainable crypto future.